“Once Upon a Time in Harlem” Opens the Door to William Greaves’ Harlem Renaissance Gathering
Memory is a powerful thing, and when shared collectively, you can feel it tremble from your head to your feet, and back again. I suspect William Greaves understood that these moments must be preserved so that we, too, could step into the invited room for conversation.
In 1972, Greaves gathered a remarkable group of artists, writers, musicians, photographers, activists and intellectuals connected to the Harlem Renaissance at Duke Ellington’s Harlem townhouse. Many had not seen one another in decades. Some had not been together in nearly 50 years.
Greaves turned on his 16mm cameras and let them talk.
That footage, restored more than half a century later, is at the heart of “Once Upon a Time in Harlem,” a documentary completed by Greaves’ son, David Greaves, after his father’s death in 2014.
The room was extraordinary. Romare Bearden was there. So were photographer James Van Der Zee, composer Eubie Blake, writer Arna Bontemps, artist Aaron Douglas, composer Noble Sissle, activist Louise Thompson Patterson and historian John Henrik Clarke, among others.
But what makes the film matter is not simply who was there.
It is what happened when they started talking.
For four hours, they remembered, disagreed, laughed, drank, challenged one another, and tried to make sense of the cultural movement they had helped create. There is no comfortable distance between the audience and history here. The people who lived it are sitting together, telling us what they remember, what they believe happened and, at times, correcting one another.
That is where “Once Upon a Time in Harlem” becomes something more than an archival document.
Greaves was never interested in simply placing great African American artists on a pedestal. He wanted to understand the conditions that allowed this extraordinary period of creativity to happen in Harlem, how one artist influenced another and how culture survives when one generation begins to disappear.
He knew the value of letting people speak for themselves.
Greaves, one of the most important African American filmmakers of his generation, is perhaps best known for the formally adventurous “Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One” and his work with the groundbreaking television program “Black Journal.” With this gathering, though, he was looking backward and forward at the same time.
The Harlem Renaissance was already history by 1972, but many of the people who shaped it were still alive. They had lived long enough to watch Harlem change, to see the Civil Rights Movement reshape the country and to witness the emergence of Black Power and a younger generation with its own language, politics and ideas about culture.
So the conversation carries another tension.
These were people being asked to consider not only what they had created, but what had become of it.
There is something deeply moving about watching that happen in real time. Someone remembers a story. Another person sees it differently. A name is mentioned and suddenly the room changes. Laughter gives way to argument. Old friendships and old disagreements sit beside one another.
History does not arrive here neatly packaged.
It talks back.
David Greaves, who was among the cameramen filming the gathering in 1972, eventually took on the work his father was unable to finish. In doing so, “Once Upon a Time in Harlem” becomes a story about inheritance in more ways than one. William Greaves preserved the conversation. His son carried it forward.
The documentary had its world premiere at the 2026 Sundance Film Festival and will have its New York premiere in the Main Slate of the 64th New York Film Festival, with screenings Sept. 29 and Sept. 30. The film is scheduled to open in select theaters through Neon on Oct. 16.
More than 50 years after those cameras began rolling in Harlem, the questions inside that room remain with us.
Who gets remembered? Who gets left out? What does an artist owe the people and community that helped shape the work? And how does one generation make certain the next understands that culture did not simply appear — somebody carried it there?
William Greaves understood that memory needed witnesses.
Thankfully, he brought a camera.
Lapacazo, the moments when one memory is corrected by another seem as valuable as the recollections themselves because disagreement reveals how cultural history gets shaped. Those exchanges also make a case for recording group testimony, since the friction between witnesses can preserve truths that a polished account might erase.
ReplyDelete